Apple Inc. and FBI Case Finally Over – So Who Really Won This Battle?

The technology company did not create the backdoor software itself, but someone else did.

The long legal case going on between Apple Inc. and the FBI over encryption of an iPhone has finally come closer to its end. The Feds have officially decided to drop their request of unlocking, rather forcing the technology company to unlock an iPhone of a terrorist suspect in the San Bernardino Attack in December. The government has recently stated the FBI no along needs Apple’s help of the specific device as it has managed to unlock the phone themselves with the assistance of a third party who remains to be anonymous. Hence, they have concluded that the assistance of the Silicon Valley giant is not required anymore.

A quick review of the case that during the San Bernardino was Attack, an iPhone 5C was discovered that happened to be that of one of the suspects who were involved in the incident, Rizwan Farook. However, after obtaining the device, the FBI was unable to unlock it and hence was unable to extract any information from the smartphone due to the strong encryption that Apple provided. However, they approached the CEO of the technology organization, Tim Cook, who refused to create a ‘backdoor’ for the device. Since the company refused to assist in this matter, as they did not want to break the security of their system and jeopardize the security of millions of iPhone users all across the globe. Later, the matter was taken to the court by the FBI due to which a number of other tech companies in the industry got involved as well including Google, Facebook and Microsoft – and understanding Apple’s stance, supported the company and stood by it.

However, after a number of hearings, the court was about to make the final announcement last week but since the FBI found a third party to assist them in their endeavor, the FBI abruptly cancelled the final hearing and stated: they required two more weeks to see if this works for them however, it was finally announced earlier yesterday that the method was successful and they were able to unlock the iPhone due to which the case is officially closed now.

This ultimately means that Apple has won this battle victorious, but has it really? We think not, as the whole point of not creating software to not jeopardize the privacy of millions of iPhone users all over the world. However, now apparently there is a backdoor if the FBI has managed to unlock the iPhone. Tim Cook continuously emphasized on how creating software to unlock would be back for privacy, national security etc. and that is exactly what has happened. The third party has managed to create software (backdoor) that can break Apple’s security measure which was only there to keep the privacy of its customer’s secure. This puts a big dent on the security encryption of Apple, and hence damages a bit of the company’s brand image as well.

Apple Inc. is not working on knowing how this was done and they want all the details of how the FBI and the third party managed to break the lock in order to make its security more strong. However, now the officials are getting back at the company by declining to do so. They have refused to let them know who the third party is and how they hacked the phone which leaves the company vulnerable to future hackers.

However, despite all this, the company states that it is on the government’s side and will support it no matter what. And they have further stated that they will continue to support the law enforcement with any of their investigations as they have continually tried to do so in the same case as well. 

Apple Inc. Vs, FBI The Case Just Keeps Getting Better

Tonight is the night we will find out who won this battle. The Monday ruling could have a huge effect on the decision.

The on-going battle between two giants the FBI and Apple Inc. has gone to another level now. All eyes are glued on who would win this battle. It all started when the FBI asked the tech giant to decrypt an iPhone that was found on one of the suspects of the San Bernardino attack in December. However, this saga has come to point where we can say that the ball might be in Apple’s court.

There had been an unrelated but similar case earlier and on Monday a federal judge in Brooklyn stated that the iPhone maker cannot be forced to by-pass the security passcode on the device. This case involves a meth dealer’s iPhone 5s by the name of Jun Feng. There was a raid at the meth dealer’s house during which the DEA – Drugs Enforcement Administration discovered a phone; while questioning the suspect, he state that he did not remember the password due to which the DEA had to turn to the FBI for assistance.

In the following months of the raid, the FBI constantly nagged the iPhone maker to unlock the device or create a backdoor for the specific device so they are able to access the data of the phone however Apple Inc. did not comply with the request of the Feds. However the authorities did not stop asking the technology company to do so despite that fact that the suspect was pleaded guilty. This makes us think that the FBI just wants the company to create a backdoor through which they are able to gain access to millions of user’s data.

The authorities even played the “All Writs Act” card to their advantage however it failed to work for them as the Federal Magistrate Judge James Orenstein stated that it lacked legal footing. They relentlessly came up with arguments for the company to comply with their request. The matter still stands that if the company even decided to create such a software it would give access of data to potentially everyone because who is to say that they the hackers will not gain access to the software.

The ruling that was passed on Monday worked more in the tech giant’s favor than in the favor of the FBI as the company and a number of other technology companies have argued at numerous occasions that they cannot be forced to do something that they do not want to do especially when it comes to the violation of its customer’s privacy. The iPhone manufacturer has made its stance very clearly with everyone publicly, despite the fact that it understands the importance of national security the organization does not want to jeopardize the privacy of its users and hence has decline to unlock the phone.

However the technology giant wants to put this case behind it now due to which it has appeal to the Congress and not the court so that a final decision can be made on the matter. Yet to see what the answer will be tonight.